Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 936/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2007. versus I.T.A. NO. 936/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 23RD FEBRUARY, 2007.

Sections 63, & 61 and (58 (?)) of the best judgment were reviewed on the date that the assessment order approval / non-compliance / justification date was made after the due date with the remarks in the order sheet The case for the hearing was not settled. The probation officer for the hearing did not list the earlier proceedings on the due date and proceeded to present his decision at a later date which was not lawful, Nothing was shown on the date actually raised for the parties' proceedings. Legal notices mark the absence of the SC in that date. Were placed, the absence of any review in the order sheet before, without any part evaluation or order passed, it is probably not possible to assume that the appraising officer had made up his mind before. Analyze on the due date and in such a situation it was necessary to issue a fresh notice or postpone the matter which was reviewed earlier. However, under section 63 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 The exercise of powers by the Assessing Officer was not permanent, the appraisal order of the law was canceled / canceled by the Appellate Tribunal. Conditions in r \ n \ r \ n female advocates from Abbottabad lawyer