Find a Lawyer

SHAHID AZIZ versus STATE

Section 302 and 83 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 29B Sindh Children's Act (XII of 1955), Section 5 Judicial Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 4 Definition of Evidence, not a case under the Sindh Children Act 1955 Was not prosecuted by the trial court under Section 29B, CR PC, nor was the case of the accused isolated, but was also dealt with by other accomplices. Which was usually the trial of a minor child. Since the court was illegal, his conviction and sentence was not sustainable, the accused could not be remanded under the Judicial Justice System Ordinance 2000 and hence the crime was committed on 21 st 1994 while the said ordinance. Was submitted in writing on the 11th day. 12 2001, which had no previous effect. Unless otherwise, the accused did not use a pistol, nor did he hurt the victim, nor did he support his brother's co-accused in any way. Was Therefore, the accused could not be charged, according to the records, nothing was available to show that the accused, who was of old age, was sufficiently mature to understand the consequences of his alleged act, when he was at that time section. ??? Even when standing at the border, sufficient evidence of the PPC was not available to link the accused to the commission of the crime and accordingly he was acquitted. online advocate from Kandiaro lawyer