MUHAMMAD HAYAT versus STATE
Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 394 bail, grant of further investigation was brought to the record by the suspect regarding the enmity between the father of the accused and the witness's father of the injured prosecutor. No injuries were reported. And during the investigation nothing was recovered from his possession. The accused was behind bars for the last 7 months and had not been involved in such cases before. In this case, the possibility of the accused being falsely excluded. The possibility could not be ruled out. Being a juvenile and being investigated by the police during the investigation, even though it was not court-bound, could be considered as a bail-out, if it was for concrete reasons, if the accused was joint in the incident. Intent was shared. There was a question of further inquiry, the accused was admitted to bail, under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Ukba lawyer