Find a Lawyer

I.T.A. NO. 1556/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 6TH OCTOBER, 2006. versus I.T.A. NO. 1556/LB OF 2005, DECIDED ON 6TH OCTOBER, 2006.

Section 130 (3) and 62 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 Remedial Rule (XLV of 1860) Delays the Delay of 210 days on the basis of an affidavit of affidavit by the First Appellate Authority. Order re-processed. Reform the assessment order immediately after the service of the order for correction of wrongdoing of income and various other defects and return of the assessment order after due service, change, enhancement and change of results for this purpose. Have to do Income and tax calculation and calculation, without selecting the correction process, reflect the parties' unrest even if it is deemed that the taxation officer has directed the assessment order to be returned. Violating a quasi-judicial order was a punishable offense. It was not appropriate to see the offense under the Conduct Rule, 1860, and jointly committed by the officers of the Assistive and Assessing Officer, as it sought reasonable fitness in examining such benefits of section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908. The status quo cannot be extended until the appellate tribunal has granted a delayed request. tax advocates from Chunian lawyer