CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI versus MESSRS AA JOY LAND (PVT.) LTD.
Sections 2 (e), 3 and 8 (2) Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Approval of waiver from levy of leisure duty, misrepresentation and fraudulent application within the jurisdiction of the City District Government jurisdiction. It was challenged that the matter was pending before the arbitral tribunal, the plaintiff submitted to the tribunal, found an agreement between the plaintiff and the defendant and prayed that the arbitration proceedings be settled in the settlement agreement. Settlement / settlement under the agreement, the provincial government filed an application under section 12 (2), the CPC alleges that the arbitration proceedings Or is based on a misrepresentation and fraud provisions of the decree passed since City District Government has no authority to give immunity. Recovery of recreation duty was to be levied under section 3 of the Validity Entertainment Duty of the Western Pakty Act, 1958, which specifically authorized the provincial government to exempt recreational duties or recreational duties from recreational duties. Given the powers by order, the seemingly specific clause of this enforced decree that exempted plaintiff Park from recreation of duty was against the mandate of the law, as no authority was available to the city district government in this regard. It was not stated that the extent to which the clause would impose duty on the park Excluding D will be a violation of the law, which will be filed under section 12 (2), the CPC said.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
