Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YUNUS BHATTI versus MUHAMMAD ARIF

Section 302 (b) of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7 (a) defines the testimony of the complainant who was the father of the deceased and the second witness of the prosecution who was the victim's brother. Confirmed. The accused had kept relations with his wife (the deceased) The doctor had specifically stated that the victim's death was due to violence, the accused was the spouse and the resident of the same house, was the person Was to be blamed for natural death. His deceased wife, unless he otherwise proves that the accused did not offer a statement on oath under section 340 (2), CRPC to explain the circumstances The death of his wife had taken place and was not examined by the other party. Examining his version, the fact that his wife died a natural death, was held at 3:30 pm for 30 minutes under suspicious circumstances and the parents of the deceased were not involved in the incident. There was a severe case to indicate that the deceased's death was not natural and the suspect feared that his crime would come to light and that is why the victim's parents were told that after their daughter's funeral. That he could not prove his innocence through rhetoric. The defense witnesses prosecution, in these circumstances, managed to take the suspect home without any suspicion of committing the murder of his wife, retaining the trial sentence and the controversial verdict of sentencing for the accused. That happened immediately. Before the death of the deceased was mysteriously shrouded, records by prosecutors inheritance advocates near Kamra lawyer