Find a Lawyer

DR. ZAHID ALI versus STATE

Sections 420, 416, 463, 464, 468, 470 and 471 of the National Database Registration Authority Ordinance (VIII of 2001), Sections 30 (F) and 31 of the Code of Conduct, section 301A (XLV of 1860) The High Court may revoke the jurisdiction under section 616161A, CRP where there was no evidence of the case or where there is no possibility of conviction of the applicant / accused in the matter of law. And that the trial before the trial court would be useless, a waste of time, a waste of time, and a misuse of court proceedings if no crime could be committed on the basis of the facts admitted on the record, Will be synonymous. The court was not listed under section 30 (f) of the National Database Registration Authority Ordinance 2000 to allow the trial to continue in the present case, but it was filed under the provisions of the Contempt of Regulations, 1860 no. Not guilty, in the circumstances was against the accused. Under Section 30 (f) of the National Database Regulation Authority Ordinance 2000, the accusations against / against the accused were inherently common because no allegation was made of him for fraud or forgery. Documents have been prepared as there is no allegation. The accused were charged with fraud, forgery and personification, with no possibility of punishment even though it was not listed under the Securities on30 (F) of the National Database Registration Authority Ordinance, 2000, but It is also believed that if an FIR was filed under the said ordinance, no case was brought out because the FIR contained the contents of such offense. female advocates from Timergara lawyer