Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ELECTROMECH ENGINEERING SERVICES, ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 50 (4), 62, 80C and 96 Income Tax Ordinance (XLEX of 2001), Circular No. 12 1991 Directive 30 6 1991 Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XX 2000 of 2000) V), Section 2 (3) & 9 (2) (a) Complaint of taxation of tax deduction accounts on the return of source to the property owner's jurisdiction over the income of the contractor was that Section 50 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979 ( 4) The tax was deducted under and a refund was made after the assessment that the complainant was not paid even after repeated requests. The complainant also in addition to the Regional Commissioner of Income Tax in response to denial of corruption. Claiming payment and requesting the exclusion of the Federal Tax Ombudsman's jurisdiction and the issuance of a valid return without delay for several months The Federal Tax Ombudsman, for some obvious reason, recommended that the relevant assessment be returned for the year. Release without delay, there will be no refund payment. Reform proceedings under Section 122 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 online advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer