IQBAL AHMED KHAN versus ASIF ALI KHAN
RR 35 (9) and 36 (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Re-counting Presents the re-counting of ballot papers, instead of entering the election result on Form XII, with the consent of the plain paper returning officer. What. The candidates counted the votes and declared the respondents as the reason given by the presiding officer for filing the results on plain paper was the snatching of Form XII by one of the candidates' agents. The twelfth was stripped of the agent by another agent. Candidates; that the contents of Form XIII of the relevant polling station were not submitted by the Presiding Officer. That the presiding officer did not have the prescribed form XII and therefore sent a counting statement on plain paper. The result was drawn up by the Presiding Officer so that the respondents could be supported and the decision could not be made in a constitutional jurisdiction. Applicants can raise such a controversial question by filing an election petition using the constitutional jurisdiction. I High Court refuses to interfere in election results Authorization requests were denied in the circumstances. \ R \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Washuk lawyer