LIAQAT ALI versus STATE
The 497 offense of adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Sections 10 and 16 bail, four months delay in filing the FIR was not adequately defined, it was alleged that the bars were for the last five months. Was behind and had no chance. In the near future when the pending case was presented, not only did the incomplete challan be presented, the alleged kidnapper did not support the FIR story, but he had filed a lawsuit against the son complainant, He was also charged with his marriage. The complainant or his alleged spouse's testimony with the alleged kidnapper was included in the investigation. Neka's spouse was not investigated.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
tax advocates from Shangla lawyer
