Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus KALSOOM BIBI

Article 10 (4), Proviso [Incorporated as Family Courts (Amendment) Ordinance (LV of 2002)] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Decisions Dispute of Marriage by Wife and Marital Rights For the rehabilitation case Husband was tried by two separate courts in view of the provisions of section 10 (4) of the Act against the husband, while the latter in favor of the section 10 (4) of the Family Courts Act, 1964 ) Was approved. The effect is that no judgment or decision of a court or tribunal will be obstructed, so the right to dissolve the marriage is only absolute and permanent on the husband's right to restore the seal and nothing else, the Family Court. After the restoration, the marriage was not properly dissolved. The verdict was for the first time for the dissolution of the marriage with the husband, so the husband was obliged to disclose that the family court ordered the trial of the remarriage of the bride to be restored, but this did not work. Can't take advantage of Otherwise, in order to dissolve marriage by the Family Court, the restoration of marital rights was legally ineffective. criminal advocate from Mirpur (AJK) lawyer