Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AMIN versus STATE

Sections 498 Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 9 (C) and 51 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 353 and 365 Before arrest, the complainant's refusal I resigned from the story I told and gave a brand new story The FIR charged that the accused could be linked to a crime and lied on a charge of recovering large quantities of hashish. As failed, the accused can be deeply appreciated at the bailout stage, neither required nor supported by the contents of the FIR in the valid and factual medical report. It was reported but there was no material available on the record which shows that the crossings were fired between the accused and that the police had clearly named the complainant in his FIR that there was no reason for the lie. Was not done The bail application for the accused's involvement in the bail application should be dealt with on the basis of the material available on record and the court was required to temporarily review the evidence. The accused on the record failed to establish corruption by the police until the accused proved that the police wanted to arrest him for trivial purposes, when there was material available on the record to link him to the crime. Then he was not entitled to the motion for arrest. There was no reasonable basis for assuming that the accused had committed any offense under Section 497, the CRPC Prohibition Clause and Section 51 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 Did not commit, there was no ground for bail before arrest, applications for grant were seized divorce advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer