Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Article 30 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, after giving a reasonable opportunity to show cause to such person, as an overview of the principles of natural justice, the applicant purchased the land in question from the Allottee who had purchased the property from the property board. Was approved Subsequent to the tax, the allotment was found to result in fraud and misrepresentation; therefore, the messenger process in favor of the allotment was canceled. The petitioner's complaint was that such action could not be taken by the Board of Revenue without giving the opportunity to hear the reason for the valid words. To make clear or unambiguous, such as proving an opinion after giving a person a reasonable opportunity to show cause through evidence, testimony, or reasoning was not a void or empty form, providing a very singular and substantive provision of the law. Was involved. Since such an expression did not mean that only section 30 (2) of the Government Land Colonial Act (Punjab) Act 1912 could be provided with an opportunity to explain against the proposed action, but not only against the proposed action. There was a fair chance to explain, but the fact that the words presented to show the cause of the defense work in section 30 (2) of the Government of the Punjab (Punjab) Colonization Act, 1912 did not mean that it was more than a mere explanation. The opportunity was ample, indicating that there is ample opportunity for well-known evidence to support the argument. In order to prove the person concerned and the dispute raised against him, the applicant should be given an opportunity to be heard by the Board of Revenue in the interest of justice. After hearing the matter and hearing the decision, the Board of Revenue remanded. Gave. Application of law how to become a advocate from Tharparkar lawyer