MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Narcotic Materials Stances Control Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6 and 9 (c) bail, further investigation grant was charged with animosity against the complainant / D under which the relevant police station was located. Such animosity between the relevant and the accused, the investigators, the police personnel should have been handed over to another police agency so that after a fair and independent investigation, such a course was not adopted and the opposite was of great interest. ? And the illegal police officers investigated the case against the accused who were not able to do so under the law, which led to doubts about the fairness of the investigation and the credibility of the story. There was a need for praise, which could be done at that time. Trial and bail may not be at the stage because it was the trial court's job to evaluate and evaluate the evidence. Identify evidence that 56kg of cannabis can be placed under the passenger seat of the jeep. Is needed because such a large amount of information may not accumulate under such a seat, however, such evidence requires deep appreciation, which cannot be processed. A temporary review of the material placed before the court during the bail phase revealed that further inquiry into the meaning of section 497 (2) was required in the case of the accused, the CCP accused were entitled to exemption on bail and accordingly He was also admitted on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Khuiratta lawyer