Find a Lawyer

NISAR A. MEER versus ASHRAF SHAHZAD

Section 417 Appeal against the Breath of Evidence Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (i), 452 and 147 Proofs, did not participate in elections for new body Election litigation began after three months, respondents It is claimed that the allegations of the newly elected chairman have taken over as chairman. He alleged that he had forcibly taken over the chairman's office illegally going to the office of the appellant / ex-chairman and causing injury to one person, the trial court acquitted all the accused but the Associate The former chairman / appellant of the session had expired and had not participated in the election which had elected the new chairman. Elections took over the office shortly after his election. The office monitored the office and no one could have predicted that he was continuing and doing so because in this baseless decision. It was stated that the appellant / former chairman / complainant failed to prove that if they were witnesses, the FIR was not examined, speculation was in favor of the newly elected chairman against the respondents. The baseless allegations made by the appellant were denied on the right that did not guarantee interference. Went, the appeal against him was dismissed best law firm from Padidan lawyer