Find a Lawyer

NADEEM versus STATE

Depending on the quantity of the drug, Section 497 Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) bail, was awarded a penalty grant to the accused, which was recovered from the accused, to prove that the whole amount There was a specific substance, for which the accused was identified, which required verification, and for this purpose it was customary for the prosecution that the sample was obtained from each piece or packet and the chemical Was sent for testing so it can be said. Or the packet contained the same substance which was confirmed that the quantity of intoxicants was slightly increased by the chemical inspector, the sentence could be extraordinarily increased and even the death sentence could be extended. Was when life was severely impacted by slight changes in the amount of substances. Humans, accused of litigation in relation to the recovery of certain substances, must be rigorously examined and, beyond any doubt, when convicted on the basis of the quantities of drug addicts recovered, It should be important for the prosecution to establish that it was a recorded substance drug and for this purpose it had to take all precautions and the case was to prove foolproof until the trial against the accused was proved. It was to be proved that the accused was involved in a specific quantity of narcotic substances which were charged even the prosecution Establish a quantity in which the accused was allegedly involved. Each pack was intoxicated by the sample, the accused was entitled to bail best law firms from Sikandarabad lawyer