JAVED IRFAN versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition Appeals for the custody of minor welfare by the petitioner / father for custody of the minor son under section 25 of the Gardens and Wards Act, 1890 On appeal, however, the Petitioner had contracted a second marriage through the appellate court and the minor's mother had also contracted the second marriage, the minor, who was about 12 years of age, had been happily living with her grandfather for many years. Was staying together, the appellate court interviewed a minor who was not pleased at the relevant time his stepmother Nab Alba lived in her father / applicant's home with a class student, the minor's maternal grandparents were caring for the minor and was going to her educational needs, the applicant / father who had contracted a second marriage. He had other children, it was not safe to remove the wife and the minor from his current family. The minor's welfare demanded that he should be allowed to stay with his grandfather's appellate court, in the circumstances of the trial court's decision. The appeal against it was rightly accepted that the question of detention of the juvenile was deliberate, and the mo In the Judea case, the matter of welfare was that in the absence of any unlawful interference or weakness of the appellate court's unlawful order, the High Court could not interfere with the exercise of its constitutional jurisdiction.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Khangah Sharif lawyer