Find a Lawyer

ZAHOOR AHMAD versus STATE

Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 324/148/149/337A (i) / 337A (iii) and 337F (i) guarantees, there was also a grant of five persons by the accused. Injured during the incident, which the police conducted self-examination, the accused suffered five sharp injuries, including injuries to two sharp-edged weapons. The complainant had suppressed all the injured while filing an FIR, the accused party also filed a cross version in his form. In a complaint pending and in which the trial court summoned the accused, the alleged incident occurred in the shop of the co-accused, which was his possession and his motive, as alleged by the complainant, There was a dispute. The joint shop had alleged that the accused and two of his accomplices had fired three witnesses of the prosecution for the wounds of the fire, two of which were not examined by the third, the third witness who suffered two injuries. The accused were acquitted. After demanding the aggression of a party, no further investigation was required; the accused could not be held hostage for the arrest of the accompanying accused, denying bail as the accused fled. , Was not a rule of thumb, especially when it was not even called a fugitive. Otherwise, the accused was entitled to bail as a matter of right and could not be denied bail only on the basis of a fugitive, which was a rule of ownership, that the accused had been in jail for about six months and initially. The trial was not over. The defendant was granted bail in terms of bail tax advocates from Patoki lawyer