Find a Lawyer

MESSRS DEWAN HATTAR CEMENT LTD., HARIPUR versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Sections 202 and 195C Section RO 484 (I) / 92, Dated 14 6 1992 Section R 978 (I) / 95, Dated 5 11 1995 Section R O 1050 (I) / 95, Dated 29 10 1995 Federal Tax Establishment of Office of the Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV 2000V), Section 2 (3) Regulatory Duty Complaint Processing Complaint Claims that the Contracting Department resolved this issue through Section 195C of the Customs Act, 1969 Has created a resignation and the department cannot approve and retake it. At the same time, since the Department on the one hand was allowing the complainants to resolve the issue under Section 195C of the Customs Act, 1969, on the other hand, it requested the recovery proceedings, the complainant had no problem with the accuracy. Was not created which required it to be disposed of. No interference has been sought for the record. It shows that the department had previously agreed to present the matter before the Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, itself. The complainants requested that the case be filed. Or alternative dispute settlement The Federal Tax Ombudsman has, under the circumstances, recommended that the matter be taken up by the Alternative Board Dispute Resolution Committee to the Central Board of Revenue and the matter to be heard and decided by this committee within a month. Should. jobs for advocates from Khanpur lawyer