Find a Lawyer

NAUBAHAR ALIAS BAHARU versus STATE

Sections 302 and 34 Criminal Procedure Code (V 1898), section 342 Definition of evidence The ocular account had the full support of the medical evidence Question 344, recording the statement under CRPC, the accused was not charged. Was. Did he, along with the co-accused, who picked up Lalcara, commit the murder of the deceased with his respective weapons, the FIR reported that the parties discussed several times in connection with the theft of the bull. It was He died seven months after the trial of the co-accused before the trial began. The trial court found the accused / appellant guilty and sentenced him to death. The accused claimed that this was an unwarranted incident. The FIR allegedly concluded that the complaining party had expressed infringement against the accused and that the accused's adverse action had not been proved in court and the FIR was immediately dismissed. The R was entered. The FIR story was dismissed as a fake conspiracy There was no enmity or unlawful desire against the accused. On all material points the intrinsic value of the perpetrator evidence presented by the complainant's witnesses was not shaken during multiple scrutiny. The Ocular account was fully supported by the medical evidence. The accused / appellant was injured. The deceased had lost his life as he was lodged in the FIR, the accused was confessed by the prosecution so that the police constable was presented, whose statement was inconsistent, which means the defense The statement was acknowledged to be true, however, finding such evidence of fugitives ask a advocate free from Killa Saifullah lawyer