Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAHID ZAHEER versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION ISLAMABAD

Article 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Promotion Respondents, who were junior to the applicant, was promoted, but the applicant was dismissed for 23 years despite his name being terminated. There was no negative comment on the service record and eligibility of the service, no penalty was imposed on the applicant on integrity or anything else, nor was there any government employee against him (talent and discipline). ) An inquiry pending under the Rules, 1973, the applicant was dismissed in a thematic manner. It was not removed from the record as to why and on the basis of which material, the applicant was credited with the reputation of being corrupt corrupt with or did not meet the eligibility criteria for his promotion; Neither thing can prove that in any negative ACR, the applicant's opinion was ever given regarding its integrity or competence. Or was there any other material before the committee on which such conclusions could be drawn. The Department also could not prove that in view of the blood count of the applicants, the policy guidelines for promotion, which were low fitness, were directed by the High Court to consider the applicant's case at the next Central Selection Board. And the Board will consider the matter independently of the previous three pending applicant constitutional requests. At the next board meeting, the extent of the applicant was allowed to be considered. \ r \ n top civil advocates from Shankiari lawyer