Find a Lawyer

SAID GHANI versus MST. BIBI AMAN

Sections 8, 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 115 suit claiming ownership, declaration and permanent injunction were the legally married wife of the claimant who transferred the property in favor of the plaintiff. Was. The defendant sold the case without the consent and consent of the plaintiff, and after the trial, the trial and appellate court filed a review against the defendant / seller against similar decree and order. Which the appellate court had also admitted. Each and every aspect of the case rendered resentful and appropriate decisions to the appropriate matters, which were not subject to the High Court's jurisdiction, both after the court had examined the evidence on file and all matters and conditions. After the discussions, very decisive decisions were made. All conclusions contained a legal defect, which were not in accordance with the evidence in the file, evidence was identified as invalid or non-readable. The Material of Record has proved that at the time of the marriage, the plaintiff's name was in the case of the plaintiff. The suit was transferred to the property, but after that he sold it without the permission and permission of his wife / plaintiff. `` The petition in question has proved satisfactorily through the statement of the author and the minor witnesses that in the absence of any misrepresentation or evidence being read on the record, several decisions and orders of the courts below which were recorded. And according to them. on r \ n \ r \ nThe Amendment may not interfere with the law on this subject attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Wana lawyer