MUHAMMAD ILYAS KHAN versus DISTRICT OFFICER REVENUE AND ESTATE OFFICE, PESHAWAR
Section 10 North West Frontier Province Service Tribunals Act (Constitution of 1974), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitutional Transfer Petitioner disqualified the order of the District Officer Revenue and State, under which the petition as Patawari. Passenger relocation and posting were ordered Returning Petitioner claimed that earlier unclean orders and orders were being affected economically and through political deliberations that required the termination of the validity transfer. And the posting to the terms and conditions of service falls into the exclusive domain of the service. The Tribunal could not step in to interfere with Article 199 of the Constitution of the Constitution even after having the exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into the matter, having the exclusive jurisdiction to inquire into the matter. This law, which has exclusive jurisdiction to investigate, may be challenged before the Service Tribunal. Appealing before the Departmental Authority and then Service T, the High Court would not like to interfere with such orders in exercising its extraordinary equitable constitutional jurisdiction, however, to deny the constitutional application filed by the applicant. Instead, it was declared an appeal before the Department Authority and withheld for its decision. In accordance with the law within the prescribed period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Larkana lawyer