CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.120/ST/IB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 30TH JANUARY, 2006. versus CUSTOMS APPEAL NO.120/ST/IB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 30TH JANUARY, 2006.
Sections 2 (46) (a), 3, 6 and 32A Section RO 579 (I) / 1990 Dated 17 5 1999 Section RO No. 206 (I) / 2001 Dated 2 4 2001 CBR Letter C No 1 ( 18) Special Audit Rules 1998, RR 2 (3), 4 and 5 of ST / AIU / 98 dated 26 9 1998, on the amount of difference due to exchange rate difference exchange rate Sales tax price validated. After the settlement period and 45 days after the acquisition, the exchange rate fluctuates as sales tax authorities charge the supply price due to the difference in the exchange rate on the original payment date of consideration. Demanded sales tax. Whether or not the tax due was reported before the date of supply before the date of supply for the determination of tax liability. If the term was earlier, ie the date of supply or the actual payment date of consideration, if the supply date was earlier, the assessee is not responsible for payment of the tax demanded in accordance with the terms of Section 2 (44) of the sales tax. shall be. Act, 1990 and if the date of payment was earlier, they will pay the said tax
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
