Find a Lawyer

TALIB HUSSAIN versus STATE

Approval of bail conditions before arrest in section 498 pre-arrest rule (XLV of 1860), section 489F, arrest of section 489F, PPC, thus appearing to change the question about Malala It is usually raised where the accused wanted to avoid bail arrest, interrogation and avoid recovery before the arrest, but in the present case the question of the recovery of the dispute was not raised. Because already the complainant had the purpose of sending the accused to jail. Further investigation, bail could not be denied before arrest, when no further inquiry was made and the challan was already presented in the trial court object of section 489F, the PPC sought to recover the money under check. Was not to be affected. The matter, the complainant always had to refer to the court of competent jurisdiction, the issue of dishonesty of the check and the dishonesty regarding its dishonesty could not be decided as the required evidence. As such, which was only possible during the trial under Section 489F, PPC, even though it was unwarranted, the High Court cannot ignore the fact that it is prohibited by Section 499, CRPC. Does not fall within the scope of the clause. Bail can also be claimed in extraordinary circumstances before the arrest, as has been properly confirmed before the ad interim arrest warrant has been given to the accused, under circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n famous supreme court advocate from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer