Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MURTAZA versus ABDUL SALAM SHAH

Article 12 Legal evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 72, 117 and 120 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Document Ounce's contents have been charged by the courts below the plaintiff to prove the facts related to the facts. That in the interest of the defendants the lawyer appointed by the plaintiff was legally contracted to sell the suit land to the defendant and it was claimed that no authority was given to the seller to sell the land, usually the attorney. The suit was dismissed by the trial court and the lower appellate court as well as the high court. In exercising the jurisdiction of the Appeal and Revision, respectively, reading the General Power of Attorney as a whole, while maintaining the judgment and decree passed by the trial court, it was clear that the lawyers had to sell the land in question in all the courts. Defendants' interest in the plaintiff was not authorized by the predecessor. The facts sought against the plaintiff below were that he failed to substantiate the contents of the General Power of Attorney through credible evidence. e The benefit of the law by the plaintiff to the Supreme Court is generally bound to prove the contents of the attorney to the extent that the lawyer is professionally authorized to sell the land between the defendants. Yes, there were questions about the coordination finding of the three courts set up by the Supreme Court to put into practice the jurisdiction amended by the High Court. The Supreme Court refused to interfere with such termination in exercise of powers under Article 185 of the Constitution. Weakness or invalidity in an unknown decision online advocate from Khanqah Sharif lawyer