I.T.AS. NOS.206/LB TO 209/LB OF 2004, 569/LB TO 572/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 18TH NOVEMBER, 2006. versus I.T.AS. NOS.206/LB TO 209/LB OF 2004, 569/LB TO 572/LB OF 2004, DECIDED ON 18TH NOVEMBER, 2006.
Section 24 (c), (4 ()) and D-52 deductions allow unacceptable fees and purchases Stock Fees and Purchase Permission Lease Association of Stock Exchange, Pakistan under section ((4 ()) of Income Tax Ordinance) And the addition of the CDC \ Fees and Subscriptions Dis 1979 was excluded by the First Appellate Authority on the basis that such payment does not fall under the nature of the delivery of goods, services offered or For the execution of the contract which was required for the application of section 50 (4) of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979. The tax is imposed under Section 52 of the Income Tax Ordinance 1979, the Income Tax Ordinance In 1979, the Department can not be increased under 24 (C), in the circumstances of the Appellate Tribunal was not intrusive and was plea Department. \ N \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Noshki lawyer
