Find a Lawyer

ALI SHER versus STATE

Sections 302, 218, 109 and 34 of the Police Order (22 of 2002), Arts 155 and 156, petitioner suspended the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, under which the applicant was summoned to stand trial in a criminal case. Was the basis and its basis was its foundation. Appealing to face the case was that he participated in a conspiracy to murder Mutawakil but there was nothing in the record to indicate that the applicant was a co-accused for the alleged conspiracy. Contacted or took any steps towards the commission of the murder of the victim. The petitioner had expressed his intention at the meeting when the victim's uncle, who had intended to kill the deceased, was not sufficient to show his involvement in the incident. The hearing of the same competence was heard by two prosecution witnesses. Had even heard, but the only difference was that the witnesses said outside the paradise where the alleged conspiracy was made, while the applicant was inside the paradise when there was no other solid incompatible material, a person was charged with mass accusations. Extreme injustice will be done to impose. The complainant could not be allowed to freely extend the net and juices to innocent people without any solid evidence. The main duty of the court was not to condemn the wrongdoer, but to save the innocent. The trial against the applicant with unnecessary hardship will be a practice of wasteful expenditure and will be grossly outrageous in the process of law under the disputed order in which the applicant was summoned to face trial. Was declared illegal and without valid justification lawer from fb area from Tando Allahyar lawyer