WAPDA THROUGH SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER versus MANZOOR HUSSAIN, EX-ALM
R 27 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Basic Rules, R18 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) Effective employee to issue notice of absence in absence of 21 years leave. Joined the WAPDA service in 1974. In 1976, she went on vacation and remarried absent for 21 years. The employee was issued a showcase notice on 30 9 1997, and the same year at the Federal Service Tribunal after treating employees for her long absence. The job was to appeal the job restoration. Extraordinary leave without pay was responsible for the mistakes made by WAPDA employees not to take notice of such absence of formal WAPDA but it was the employee who was not one day but more than that. Had to justify his absence. The absence of the employee for two decades was so grave and unreasonable that there was no need for an inquiry. The delay made by WAPDA was perfectly legitimate. I could not be allowed to rejoin, under the WAPDA Leave Rules for Wapda Employees 1982, it was expressly provided that there was even one employee with different types of addresses. By becoming an employee, if he has been absent for a fixed term, even under Rule 18 of the Basic Rules, a civil servant who has been absent continuously from duty for more than five years or without leave; I stopped living. The issuance of showcase notices may be termed as adjournment but in any case for 21 years
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
