TARIQ NAEEM versus STATE
Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), section 394/411/109 bail, the accused's grant name was not filed, seven days after the incident, the accused was involved only on the basis of suspicion. had gone. The robber was involved in it. No direct proof of settlement was available against the accused. The alleged father-in-law's money was recovered from Rs. 1,50,000. Pakistani currency was not looted by the alleged robbers. Was gone In fact, the motorcycle was robbed of the accused and was used by other accused in the present case or whether the accused provided them to commit theft, further inquiring that the accused had been in custody for more than 16 months. Was behind bars. Under the allegations, the trial was not in the immediate view of the trial until otherwise, the accused could not be denied bail because of the start of the trial, if further investigation was required in that case, o Accused under the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Dhatmal lawyer
