MERAJ HUSSAIN versus JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM, NORTHERN AREAS, GILGIT
Section 324/34 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 6/7 The Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Section 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Petition reduced by the jurisdiction of the Anti-Terrorism Court. The trial of age offenders was subsequently issued by law, which reduced or limited the powers of the trial of a juvenile justice system ordinance, 2000, to the trial of a child of an anti-terrorism court. Because the said ordinance would work in addition to contempt of any other law. The Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, involved in a terrorism case defined in the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, can be prosecuted legally by a court established under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 against the Force-infected child. And the provisions of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, shall not affect the trial of a child by the Anti-Terrorism Court, rejecting the impeachment order approved by the Counter-Terrorism Court. Accused of prosecuting them, resulting in the dismissal of the constitutional petition Accordingly, it was excluded by agreement with the 2005 MLD 1028
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
