Find a Lawyer

PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus JAVED IQBAL

The re-opening of land in the land allotment dispute under Sections 19, 30 and 36 of the Guru Mowar Food Scheme, was allotted to the respondents in the interest of the respondents under the 'Guru Mover Food Scheme', in the year, 1960 onwards. Authority resumes without issuance of original allotment notice and notice of its original allotment suit for permanent injunction, which was resumed due to a violation of the terms and conditions of the allotment, which was eventually rejected by the trial court. And the Appellate Court had no jurisdiction over the Member Board of Revenue / IRA to become a real estate property Or proprietary rights in the land were the option to reboot, which conflict, if kalunysn Government Lands (Punjab) Act, 1912 section had to be summoned by the provisions of 30 members, Board of Revenue. , Then a notice must have been issued, indicating the alleged acquisition of state land and its formal agreement, by actual means of defining and identifying allegations of such fraud or misrepresentation. No notice was issued and no opportunity for a cancellation of the allotment was provided by the Member, Board of Revenue in favor of the allotment. The nature of the jurisdiction was found in the simultaneous investigations by the two courts, the appellate court-approved judgment and order was upheld, and it was said that the decision had been dismissed. \ R \ n \ r \ n us immigration advocates from Kashmir lawyer