Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMMIAD IQBAL versus RETURNING OFFICER U.C. NO.64, LAHORE

RR 35 (5), 36 (3), 65 and 71 Civil Code of Conduct (V 1908), OV, RR 10, 12, 19, 20 and O IX, R 13 Constitutional petition re-counting constitutional petition, ballot papers count , A request for a pre-emptive proceeding against the defendant on the refusal to accept the notice from the processor server of the ballot papers by the Election Tribunal and a request to revoke the former party order by the applicant under OIX, R13, CPC. Refusal to apply as a successful candidate by donor. He served neither personally nor knew the election request. And that the re-enumeration was not in accordance with the law. Such a request by the Election Tribunal to be dismissed. The Election Tribunal did not inspect the processor server to testify in its written report in terms of OV, R 19, CPC, or any other method or report by reference in the paper. Until today, it was published against the defendant, against which the previous record was contrary to the election tribunal that the respondent was personally presented by the registered post A / D. The Election Tribunal ordered the counting of ballot papers based on the concession statement of another applicant. The petition for re-counting of ballot papers also contained the order of re-counting of ballot papers was dusty / unreasonable and did not cite any material by which respondents were referred to the newspaper by reference. The counting was ordered after it was approved, but it was not sent to his postal address in the election petition. Such a request could not be decided in a nutshell, which was controversial. criminal advocate from Muridkay lawyer