Find a Lawyer

PATHAN versus STATE

Definition of Sections 302 (b) and 300 Evidence. The complainant, who gave the account to the eye witness, had stood the cross-examination permanently and his testimony was also confirmed by the testimony of the other prosecutor, confirming the deposition of the three witnesses through a post-mortem report. Was done The victim, who proved that he had received a wound near 12 with a sharp weapon, also confirmed the time of the crime through a post-mortem report, scaling the ocular version with scissors / offensive weapons at the slightest indication of the suspect's change. Recovery received more confirmation. In the same account, there may have been a meeting between eyewitnesses and the accused, but it was not of the nature to be ignored alike, the witnesses of the two prosecutors had sufficiently explained their presence at the relevant time. The eyewitnesses and the deceased, by no means, neglected their evidence because their evidence was corroborated by other independent sources, such as from medical evidence and crime recovery weapons to the indictment of the accused and the motive. The recovery, which was the victim's anger / hostility against the victim, who was allegedly instrumental in the former exchange, was fully proven by the prosecution. In the circumstances, the charge against the accused was able to prove beyond reasonable doubt, the crime was already understood and he was hanged most cruelly without mercy because the accused had his whole body But the scissors did eleven, resulting in no evidence of death. By no means was there any kind of provocative and sudden provocativeness available by the Late accused of the least punishment for himself. tax advocates from Kumbh lawyer