SHAUKAT ALI versus DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER, BUREWALA DISTRICT VEHARI
Article 489F Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition hearing FIR checks abolished Although the petitioner was issued by the applicant before entering section 489F, it was not a crime to issue the check on his own. Because it was only after that. He said that the check was submitted to the bank and because of its dishonesty, it would be a crime to issue the check illegally under section 489F, the PPC is being dishonestly issued the check, It will be drawn to when the check bounce was made. A wrongdoer's bank dishonesty will only be prosecuted when the check was bounced by the bank and the crime can be committed only if the time of the occurrence will be calculated from that date. From the date when the bank was dishonored, it was said that the check was issued in the opinion of the petitioner's counsel that Section 489F, PPC, could not be applied to the former effect, in this case. The offense was set up when the checks were presented to the bank and they were insulted, which was after the entry of section 489F, PPC PLAYA, that the civil defense During Witt's approval, the criminal proceedings could not be initiated, as he was misunderstood because the civil suit was filed solely for the recovery of the suspect, in that regard there is a reasonable remedy and In connection with the crime case, a criminal proceeding was initiated, both remedies can be obtained at the same time the applicant was unable to present a case. The request was dismissed while terminating the FIR
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
