Find a Lawyer

AMIR SARDAR versus STATE

Article 199, Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (VII of 1947), Section 23, 4 and 3 of the constitutional petition has resulted in the cancellation of the FIR, with the foreign currency of different denominations of heavy price, which is in violation of its There was a sale and purchase deal. Section 4 accused of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, was connected to the commission of a confessional offense, not a licensed or authorized dealer in a foreign exchange under section 3 of the aforesaid act charged by the prosecution with prejudicial evidence And the alleged action was fully covered by section 23 of the stand that he was a foreign currency account holder and holding such currency was not a crime, after the trial the registration of litigation Cannot be done Controversial facts dispute constitutional petition was excluded famous supreme court advocate from Ludhan lawyer