Find a Lawyer

MESSRS HAQ FEED INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCE CORPORATION

Appeal for leave to apply for the recovery of suit 9, 10 and 22 suit loan was declared as Appeal suit in the amount of Rs 38,50,348 and it was said that after deduction of the claim for the damages associated with it. The money has been worked out, which has formed part of the aforementioned money. Defendant's claim for the defendants was that the plaintiff's bank had a statement in the plaintiff's account, a misconduct: The defendant supported the unwanted decree, stating that the defendant's compensation amount was returned to the plaintiff. The detailed statement was not in accordance with the plaintiff and the claim as stated in the Plaintiff, a decision could not be made, despite the fact that the leave to defend the case was denied, in an unknown decision. Not a single word was mentioned about how the banking court proceeded on the decree. The Yanking Court did nothing to reconcile the case with the various statements made by the plaintiff's bank account. The plaintiff was not allowed to amend the defendant properly and consequently the defendants were not allowed to defend the case. The judgment and order passed by the Banking Court to grant leave was set aside which will be considered pending in the court. Ask the parties the modified rock will be taken on record and then the defendants will be given the opportunity to edit the written statement and it will be decided in accordance with the law. ask a advocate free from Karore Lalisan lawyer