Find a Lawyer

MST. NAJMA versus MST. FARHA REHAN

Sections 8 and 54 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), acquisition of possession, permanent injunction and declaration of consent for damages, non-refusal of the defendant, during the course of the trial, The motion submitted was accepted by the plaintiff and accordingly his decision was also preferred by the plaintiff against the injunction, instead of obeying his firm commitment and consent. Plaintiff dismissed by the High Court, is that she did not give her husband the authority to act as his lawyer. In entering into any settlement, the Court of Appeal did not agree with the plea that the husband acting as the plaintiff's lawyer had no power to compromise or compromise on his behalf. Away from the satisfaction and ownership that reflected his absence. Honesty and justice can only be regretted and the Supreme Court has not advised discouraging such clients nor to accept such brief statements before the High Courts, which has always led to law. The cause of defamation of the superior profession's image as well as the petitioner's petition was laid, ill-advised and disqualified at special costs. best law firm from Charsada lawyer