Find a Lawyer

AHMAD HASSAN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Section 13, Pre-Striking Rights, Cases of Contemporary Evidence Not Presented to the High Court The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's case on the ground that he could prove to the High Court that the student exercised jurisdiction. Was unsuccessful. On the contrary, and Pnd ordered the suit taken by the vendor, although the date was given in Gaddai, however, none of the witnesses, including the emperor, disposed of the evidence with regard to it. The petition was not proved before the matter was not taken up before the High Court, therefore, it could not be brought before the Supreme Court before the emperor had to give evidence in evidence that the petitioner's suit was mentioned by him. I was done, it had failed. The date mentioned in the Plaintiff's date on which the petition was made was not proved in the evidence. ereon Even if before the High Court, there was no aggravation on the issue of student immunity, when the matter was settled and the Supreme Court was not prevented from giving its results, then the Supreme Court The case was refused by the hand court. Since there was no need for realism on this issue, it was evident from the record that the history of the preacher's death had failed to prove the evidence of the deceased mentioned in the preamble, because of the creation of the victim. The date was not established, in which case the trial court was reversed against the principles of the decision of the Supreme Court and the order passed by the High Court was set aside. tax advocates from Landi Kotal lawyer