AL-KARAM TEXTILE MILLS (PVT.) LIMITED THROUGH DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER versus MEHTAB CHAWALA AND 3 OTHERS
Sections 21 and 46 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), OXXXXXXX, 2003 and suit for infringement of trademark in interim injunction, grant to the plaintiff on the use of trademark from the year 1999, but not before the defendant Documents produced by Ali show that he continued to operate under this trademark in 2000, while dealing with the defendant never objected to the use of such trademark with the defendant. Is done Or an allegedly similar trademark was used prematurely for the plaintiff in a trademark that could not prevent the plaintiff from using the suit of the same plaintiff on the basis of the registered trademark, Was prevented from issuing a lien, the plaintiff was unsuccessful in balancing the facility, lying in favor of the defendant, preventing him from using the trademark that was in use. For the past 20 years, the plaintiff was denied more than the plaintiff in the interim injunction circumstances \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Naudero lawyer