Find a Lawyer

MIR MUHAMMAD versus MUHAMMAD PANNAH

Under section 53 and 172 (2) (vi) of the Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (VV 1908), Section 115 and O VII, R 11 suit, declaration of sections 53 and 172, Western Claimants claiming the Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, to reject the jurisdiction of the civil court, claim that they were granted exclusive land in 1974, in the circular dated 14.5 1930 in respect of land clearance in the desert area. According to government policy, he was constantly in control. The Tharparkar District Officer Revenue has changed the application for possession of the applicant without its order dated 29, 2003, without notice or hearing, the applicants filed a case for declaration under Section 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967. What was Under the Civil Court and the Court of Appeal and the VIII, R11, CPC, several applicants were simultaneously dismissed, leading to the case filed by the applicants under Section 172 (Section 172 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967). 2) was withheld in view of (vi). There is a difference between section 172 (2) (vi) and section 573 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act 1967, which deals with the amendment of section 172 (2) (vi) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Was. Entry into the registration of rights records, periodically, periodically or records or modifications, while section 33 ?? of the Act was in relation to complaints by registration in the record of the rights of any individual and if the applicants were in possession, it would be subject to section 33 Can set the case for declaration under The suit of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967, filed by the petitioners, was not barred under section 172 (2) (vi) of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967 pakistani advocates Talamba lawyer