Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ISHAQ SAQI versus STATE

Sections 497 Sales Tax Act (VII of 1990), Sections 2 (37), 3 (1) (A), 4 (A), 6, 7, 8, 10, 22, 26, 33, 34, 37 and 73 guarantees. , Denying the size of the fraud found, was over Rs 9 crore. Which showed that the government treasury was subjected to brutal revenge by the criminals following various obstacles and techniques. It was alleged that his signatures did not appear on documents such as checkboxes and so on. But the statements of the witnesses show the manner in which the accused did not restrict his activities to the companies listed in the FIR, but to the other companies as well as to the fact that under section 497 (1), CRPC Had not attracted the prohibition clause, it was not enough to release the culprits themselves. The brutal cruelty in which the government treasury was broken cannot be taken lightly, the bail could not be allowed for the treasury and robbers of the national treasury for the simple reason that the crime section 497 (1), did not attract the CRPC prohibition clause. Bail applications were dismissed immigration advocates email from Shahpur Chakar lawyer