MST. RASHEEDA BANO versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE
Section 8 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), OVII & R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 OVII for dismissing applicants' allegations of dismissal of the plaintiff for the recovery of the case , R 11, Application filed under CPC. Earlier, he filed a lawsuit against the plaintiff claiming ownership of the suit house, dismissing the plaintiff's request, and dismissing the trial court's decision and reviewing the trial court's decision. The plaintiff's claim was that the defendant occupied the under house. The tenant, but subsequently filed a lawsuit for a permanent injunction and refused to pay the rent and if the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties did not enter, The property owner / landlord could not go to the rental controller. At this point it had two options open. Either seeking treatment before the leaseholder, or for the cure of a civil court to recover possession on a property-based basis and in a property claim, the declaration was conditional until the plaintiff proved his ownership of the property. Unable to do so, in the case of Defendant's conflict that the plaintiff was not the owner of the suit and the defendant was the owner of the suit, the jurisdiction of the tenant in control of the tenant will not be rejected. Was subdued and given the title and counter title. O VII, R 11 shall not be barred from filing for possession, the CPC invalidating the proportional order passed by the following courts
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
