Find a Lawyer

ALI SHER versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302, 337H (II) and 392 offenses against property (Enforcement Hood) ordinance (VII of 1979), section 20 bail, and the grant of further investigation to the police. The next day of the incident and the suspect was not identified by the complainant and other witnesses; a witness of the prosecution; after four days of the incident, it was stated to the police that he had identified the accused as a robber. That the witness did not provide any plausible explanation for the anonymity for four days, neither the robbery's mobile phone set nor any weapon was recovered from the accused where the prosecution. The witness did not disclose the name of the accused to anyone for four days and the accused was not identified, said the five persons, including the complainant, who had not seen the stolen property nor recovered arms, in the case of the accused. In need of further investigation which was considered in section 497 (2), CR PC accused, under circumstances, admitted on bail registration advocate from Chak Sawara lawyer