Find a Lawyer

ASGHAR ALI versus OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR

Section 10 (1) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Appeal against the orders of the Company Judge Forum Expression ?? Appeal against any court order, decision or decision \ Notification word \ No \ Import appeal against Art! : The order, the judgment or judgment of the court passed under the Companies Ordinance, 1984, will lie in the Supreme Court where the company was ordered to be injured, the paid up capital of the company was not less than one million. And, where the company was ordered to be injured, had less than Rs 1 lakh in payment, or had no capital, such appeal would be made only when such matter was before the Supreme Court. Intra-Court of Appeals will be allowed. The court was not authorized to say that anyone had increased the scope and after terminating it the company brought any order of the judge into its jurisdiction such as les order \, \ verdict \ or verdict \ single against, that is, the meaning of the order. The appeal I was granted. Section 10 (1) of the Companies Ordinance, 1984, was not limited to an order only when the purpose of the legislature was terminated, when a specific sentence was ordered to wrap up the company. An attempt was made to injure. Used to expand the scope of the appeal of each decision, when a company was ordered to wrap up, it was said that words and phrases were meaningful to bring the scope of appeal, the company judge As a result of all the orders / decisions / decision waiver orders passed by the company, the order to abolish the extant order was made in the present time and the appeal against such order was not before the Division Bench of the High Court. top advocates from Moro lawyer