Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 440, 109, 148 and 149 bail, further inquiry against the accused was alleged that in his aggression / motive, his accompanying accused was the subject of the murder. The FIR revealed that the accused and his accomplices were heard by the prosecution's witnesses, while they plotted a crime commission. And said the witnesses heard them as they were approaching the co-accused mode and the manner in which the prosecution witnesses heard the suspect and his co-accused being the perpetrator of the crime. Conspiracy was a conspiracy, it was a conspiracy or an unnatural and suspicious case of abuse, it was not present on the spot, it was better that the accused seduced his partner to prove that he was present on the spot. And generally, the accused was granted bail on the basis of further inquiry. The circumstances came under sub-section (2) of section 497, the PC accused was long behind bars and the agency did not furnish the challan, the circumstances of this case will not benefit anybody, the accused bail Admitted, in the circumstances family advocate from Sanghar lawyer