Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MAJEED versus DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, LASBELA AT HUB

Article & Constitution Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application vacating official residence from the possession of retired government employee Petitioner, as the sub-registrar was provided government accommodation, notice to vacate them after the applicant's retirement. The house was demolished, but he did not vacate the petitioner's claim that he had applied for a housing allotment before retirement and the chief minister as well as the tehsil Nazim also requested him to allot the house on a property basis. Was recommended. There is no dispute between the parties in this case, at the request of the applicant who ordered the leave of the applicant from the applicant on behalf of the District and Sessions Judge, after the applicant has retired from the job of the applicant. Is owned and after his retirement the applicant had no locksmiths to retain his control. Submitting an application for a house allotment cannot constitute any right / title in favor of the applicant or retaining his possession and it cannot be said that the applicant should be referred to the West Pakistan Government Land and Land. Under the buildings there is no legal right to challenge the proceedings initiated against him for eviction. Under the Ordinance, 1966, no order was required from any court to dispose of an unauthorized occupant and the sessions judge had no jurisdiction to request the removal of unlawful possession. The department had to take action to locate the applicant, which failed ask a advocate free from Jampur lawyer