Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ROHI GHEE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS

Applicants' request for return of suit customs duty for declaration of return of customs duty confiscated for sections 33, 168 and 217 of imported goods has been rejected, appeals also dismissed before the Customs Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal. Once the importers have begun to take advantage of this procurement provided by the legal forum till the stage of the Customs, Excise and Sales Tax Appellate Tribunal under the Customs Act, 1969, the Plaintiffs / Plaintiffs filed a declaration in the High Court. If the matter is decided against, they cannot do so. It is permissible to change the forum by way of civil suit and to reschedule the same dispute on the factual aircraft, although under the legality of such orders, under certain circumstances neither the importer / the plaintiffs nor the economic As requested and no legal action was taken against it. Wish of jurisdiction and have not brought any light - Same jurisdiction and redistribution of any unlawful interference shall be a gross violation of the High Court proceedings unless otherwise stated in Section 217 of the Customs Act 1969 In view of the bar I was in, the cases filed by the importers were ineligible. \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocates phone number from Shamsabad lawyer