Find a Lawyer

WAHID ALI versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, PESHAWAR

Section 182 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Section 199 Constitutional Applicant Seized Vehicle Sale Auction by Seized Open Auction, The applicant was purchased by the highest bidder and the applicant submitted the sale price and the car. An appropriate sales certificate was issued to get the services of the applicant, after completing all the legal formalities, was delivered to the applicant, who later sold the same to another person, in his name. That was the one that got registered. Applicants (auction buyers and others) contacted authorities for a refund regarding the sale of auction carriers, but after a car was reported stolen due to an objection certificate, Authorities failed to return the money State workers had deprived a citizen of his property y) After giving the applicant an absolute and lasting impression that he was, nevertheless, guilty of all the faults of car ownership, a stolen property. And when the authorities received the money in the manner under the constitutional mandate, then by selling the car in answer to the question. The applicant is obliged to return the money to the authorities, who failed to pay their legal obligations; in no way was it permissible to withhold the money paid by the applicant (auction buyer). The treatment received by the applicant on request could not be held. Authorities have to spend more than three years after receiving the money from the auction buyer on behalf of both the auctioneer and the car buyer on any forum for civil or similar relief. best advocate from Abbaspur lawyer