Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

ROSHAN DIN JUNEJO versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY LOCAL GOVERNMENT SINDH SECRETARIAT, KARACHI


In compliance with the order of Article 24 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application High Court, the District Nazim Procedure Chairman, Election Authority's internal memorandum, through a notification, nominated a member to the panel of presiding officers, who was first elected. was done. Meeting of the District Council under Section 24 (5) of the Sindh Local Government Ordinance 2001, presiding and presiding over the meeting of the District Council for the commemoration proceedings in accordance with the provisions of section 24 of the said ordinance. Zila Nazim has a full opportunity to address the House in the manner provided under the law. Accordingly, the meeting of the House was summoned and a notice was issued to the District Nazim for attending the meeting and addressing the House. , Which was officially attended by sixty-six people. Out of the 83 members of the District Council, the committee was chaired by a panel member, with the permission of the house to read the mover / member, the contents of the movement in the presence of the District Nazim (applicant), who, during the uprising, Was addressed at length after which the Presiding Officer invited members to express their views, but members requested the Presiding Officer to vote for the motion, after which a secret ballot was sent to the members to cast their vote. Was allowed to be shown to members of the empty ballot box and press and media representatives before the voting began , 64 of the 68 members of the movement voted in favor of the movement, and only three members voted against the motion, while a ballot was found vacant, it seemed there was no irregularity in the session's action under question. Not an illegal act

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Kakur Town lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.